The Internet, social networking, and virtual reality have so much ingrained in our lives that debating their benefits or harms is like debating whether we need electricity, hot water, or antibiotics. We spend a lot of time on social networks, solving business problems, socializing, and having fun. And that is perfectly normal for an adult. But the situation is completely different when it comes to children.
Children are the product of our upbringing. For years the family loves, cares, and invests in the child. But in the end we have either a new adult person or an "eternal boy" or an "infantile girl", even if the grown-up child is 20-30-40 years old.
Why does one person grow into a good and worthy person, and another - not so much? Because the results depend on what exactly we put into the child.
Naturally, children imitate their parents in every way, so if mom and dad do not get away from the computer, it may become normal for their child. Many parents do not see anything bad in the fact that their baby agrees to eat only watching cartoons, that the schoolboy surfs the Net after doing his homework, that the teenager corresponds with virtual friends. After all, it is so convenient - they don’t ask for anything, they are busy, and they are at home. You don’t need to talk to them or explain things to them - everything can be found online.
And therefore, the question of “whether to limit our children’s time in the virtual space” is not a subject of thought for many parents. If there is bad behavior, we will punish them and take away their phones, computers and consoles; it there is good one, we will encourage. But is it that simple?
On the one hand, the verb "to bound" means "to restrict". But on the other, it also forms the root of another word - "boundaries". This term has become very popular recently – both children and adults know about their personal boundaries, fight for their integrity, and monitor their violations.
Our boundaries are formed through the appropriation of rules that our parents transmit. Every time parents "pity" a child, change the rules on the go, and fail to set limits, they face a paradox, as in the old song, "You wanted a thunderstorm, but you got a goat". Therefore, reasonable limits are mandatory for children's boundary formation. Otherwise, they will not learn the rules of life in society, will not learn to be patient today for the sake of a better tomorrow, will not be able to withstand the stress associated with “must”, in favor of “want”.
It’s not easy for parents, because a small child is making a fuss and screaming, a younger schoolchild is quietly breaking the rules, and a teenager is rebelling. Sometimes you want to give up on everything - let him do what he wants, I don't have the strength to fight anymore. But responsibility for boundaries is part of parental duty.
Boris Sergeyevich Bratus, a Russian psychologist, once suggested that pleasure without effort is the way to an alcoholic psyche. And if a child spends endless time on social networks or plays games, he or she becomes uninterested in "boring everyday life" and "gray reality" - after all, you can just turn on a computer or pick up a phone.
Of course, virtual life ranges from normal use to Internet addiction, so restrictions should be reasonable. Children can use the Internet to watch useful content, do homework, and socialize. But in the case of abuse, the child does not develop boundaries:
The Internet, like everything else in this world, can be both evil and good, poison and medicine. If a child is not good at socializing, virtual friends may be a good opportunity. If he or she is interested in crafts, there is an option to find a useful video online and get detailed and clear instructions. If there is a wish to study something in depth, relevant information can be found online. But if a child has gone over to the “dark side,” parents should pay close attention to this.